OCTET

Oberlin Center for Technologically Enhanced Teaching

By

Current use of LMS (Blackboard)

Currently Blackboard …

serves as a portal that provides

  • interactive websites for all courses and various offices.
  • Space for HR information

Read More

By

LMS players

Blackboard 9.1 (OWU)

Blackboard Ultra

Canvas (St. Johns, Middlebury)

Schoology (Wheaton)

Notebowl (Denison)

Google Classroom

Moodle (Kenyon, Wooster)

Sakai

 

By

Survey of faculty and students who have used systems other than Blackboard

A recent survey was conducted via Blackboard (Nov 19-22) asking users if they have used other LMS products and what their impressions were of those relative to what we are currently using.

Here are some of the results: Read More

By

Letter to Faculty (based on student data in survey)

To all faculty Blackboard users:

This letter is written by a Student Tech Assistant in OCTET and is meant to reflect views from the survey, personal opinions withheld. Please direct any questions and concerns to octet@oberlin.edu
The complete survey results can be found here.
Read More

By

Common Themes in BB Survey Answers

The survey referenced in this article was administered in Nov or 2015 as a due diligence assessment of our current system, Blackboard.  The process is outlined in another post.

Broad stroke summary of results:

Faculty are definitely frustrated by some aspects of Blackboard. However, they are not so frustrated that they are willing to move to another system.  Students are frustrated more with how the tool is being used than how the tool works. We’ve put together a short ‘letter to faculty‘ that is based on the responses given by students.  In this ‘letter’ we’ve also included some advice on how to deal with some of the ‘problems’ students reported. Read More

By

Blackboard Review Process outlined (2016)

A Blackboard review is being conducted during the Spring 2016 semester. The process includes:

  • Convening of a core group of individuals who make use of Blackboard. This includes reps from the faculty, ResEd, Deans Offices, Athletics and students:
    • Allison Gallaher, Ben Kuperman, Bill Denneen, Chester Andrews, Liz Clerking, Jan Cooper, Jason Hudson, Martin Hundley, Pam Snyder, Steven Wojtal, Zeb Page, Rebecca Mosely, Al Porterfield, Robert Thompson, Albert Borroni, Megan Mitchell
  • Development and deployment of a survey to assess usage, satisfaction and needs (week of Feb. 22nd, 2016).
    • development in Qualtrics
    • advertising via posters, image/notice in Blackboard and email
  • Analysis of survey data and review by committee 3/31/16
  • Reconvening the group to convey information from survey and Blackboard analytics
  • focus groups to address outstanding questions
  • Scheduling vendor demonstrations for Schoology, Canvas (May 10th, 2016), and Blackboard (May 9th, 2016).  Consider the use of google classroom and Moodle.
  • Reconvene group to form a recommendation.

Begin the process of negotiating and moving forward either with Blackboard or another product (the hard stuff).

By

Data from student and faculty survey conducted in 2013

Technology in the service of teaching and learning: data from spring survey of Faculty & Students, 2013

We have created a site to provide feedback — finally — with respect to the tech and teaching survey taken by 118 faculty last spring.  The survey addressed faculty use of technology and their desires/needs for technology in the future.

It also contains information from the student survey that was taken by >400 students.

Thanks to everyone that filled it out. The results have already been used to inform a SPRITE committee on learning management systems AND classroom spaces.  We’ve also used it to make decisions on workshops and are using it as a starting place for discussions that involve student observations on tech and learning.

We are still referring to some of this data although we recognize that it may be out of date already.

By

Investigation of On-line Evaluation systems

Products:

There are many products that claim to do online student evaluations of teaching (SETs).  Here are but a few:

Implementing on-line evaluation system

Information on the implementation of on-line evals at Oregon State University. This article addresses many of the standard questions about moving from in-class paper evaluations to on-line out of class evaluations.

Some interesting pieces discussing the (mis)use of SETs (paper or on-line):

Functional Requirements

  • Administrator
    • Allows for multiple administrators who are administering a specific subset of surveys that go out to specific courses.
    • Allows for overarching administrators who can see all survey results
    • Collates information using different criterion relevant to Individual reflection, PTT, Dept Reviews and Accreditation
    • Allow for managing release of information to faculty
    • Has tools for increasing response rate
  • Student side
    • Integrates with LMS – timed release of notices to students
    • Keeps track of surveys that are complete for the student
  • Faculty
    • Differentiates between discuss based, lecture and labs
    • Collate information from the same course across years

By

Who's online (Blackboard building block)

  Who’s on Blackboard is a Blackboard building block built to help students connect when they are working on Blackboard assignments. It was build by students for students and is under continual development.  For instance, students are currently working on an opt-out feature.

Photos are the same as the ones that show up on the landing page when someone logs in and can be changed by clicking on the Change Photo link in that module.

Information is taken from the student information system with the first name being taken from the ‘nickname’ field in Banner. Therefore, to change this setting , you will need to work with the registrar.

The program which was a winter term project, uses Blackboard APIs to access data that is stored on the blackboard server to show who is currently logged in. Furthermore this module filters and organizes the users who appear online by course. The purpose of this module is to encourage classmates to collaborate outside the classroom, especially in large lecture classes. This module will also be useful to students who are assigned group assignments with students they may not already know, allowing you to see your classmate’s photo along with their name and a link to their email.  All of this information is visible in the email directory.  Ideally, this module will be updated in the future to include an instant messaging feature.

    “Writing this module challenged us as programmers and critical thinkers. We became familiar with computer science languages including XML, HTML, JSP, CSS and strengthened our overall object-oriented programming skills. We experienced the difficulties of using APIs with mostly outdated documentation such as Blackboard’s and learned to navigate Blackboard’s framework. Overall, this experience has strengthened our skills as programmers and as team players.”

-WT OCTET 2014, Web Application Programming

By

Smart Classroom info

At one time, faculty and AAs desired a tool that would allow them to see what equipment was in each classrroom.  As a service we wrote an application that allowed one to search for any smartclassroom on campus.

Data was gathered by talking to A/V and by going to specific rooms.  This has become very time intensive in that there are currently >70 smartclassroom spaces on campus.

Since the original roll-out of this application, we have added data from the registrar such that one can no find out not only what is in a particular classroom but when and who is teaching in a particular space.  Additionally, where a particular person is teaching can also be listed very easily.

The tool is currently available and is updated daily during the first month of the semester but only weekly after add/drop.